Skip to main content
· 7/8/1929

Rodrigues v. Edwards

Citations

  • 33 F.2d 1003
  • 7 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 9260
  • 1929 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1387

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding sustained telephone and email communications over the course of seven months were not “random, fortuitous, or attenuated”
  • “Stare decisis is of fundamental importance to the rule of law.” (quotation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Knox

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.