· 7/8/1929
Rodrigues v. Edwards
Citations
- 33 F.2d 1003
- 7 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 9260
- 1929 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1387
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding sustained telephone and email communications over the course of seven months were not “random, fortuitous, or attenuated”
- “Stare decisis is of fundamental importance to the rule of law.” (quotation omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Knox
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.