Rodrigue v. VALCO Enterprises, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that by the time the plaintiff knew of the facts listed above, “[the] plaintiff had more than sufficient information to alert him that a dram shop cause of action... might be available to him”
• “The focus is on a plaintiffs knowledge of facts that would put a reasonable person on notice of the general nature of damage and that the damage was caused by the wrongful conduct of an attorney.”
• “[W]e have construed the discovery rule to commence the running of the statute of limitations [once] a plaintiff discovers or reason ably should discover the injury, its cause, and the existence of a cause of action.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).