Rodrigue v. Mendenhall

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that it was not necessary that buyer of printing equipment, which was fraudulently represented not to be encumbered, exhaust all means at his command to ascertain the truth of the representations
• “[T]he measure of damages in an action for fraud and deceit is the difference between the actual value of the property at the time of purchase and what the value would have been if it had been as represented.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).