Rodrigo Turijan v. Eric Holder, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reviewing unpublished BIA decision and holding that felony false imprisonment did not qualify as a CIMT because it does not require an intent to injure someone, an actual injury, or a protected class of victims
• reviewing unpublished BIA decision and holding that felony false imprisonment did not qualify as a CIMT because it does not require an intent to injure someone, an actual injury, or a protected class of victims
• “[N]on-fraudulent crimes of moral turpitude ‘almost always’ involve the intent to injure, actual injury, or a protected class of victim.” (quoting Nunez v. Holder, 594 F.3d 1124, 1131 (9th Cir. 2010))
• “[T]he crime does not require any of the three factors set forth above.”
• “[T]he crime does not require any of the three factors set forth above.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).