Skip to main content
· 8/21/2014

Rodricus Hurst v. Lee County, Mississippi

Citations

  • 764 F.3d 480
  • 38 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1607
  • 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 16153
  • 2014 WL 4109647

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that inquiry into public employees’ First Amendment claim concerns whether statements were made pursuant to their “official duties”
  • noting that inquiry into public employees’ First Amendment claim concerns whether statements were made pursuant to their “official duties”
  • \Judgment as a matter of law may be granted when a party has been fully heard on an issue during a jury trial and the court finds that a reasonable jury would not have a legally sufficient evidentiary basis to find for the party on that issue.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stewart, Wiener, Costa

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.