Rodrick Legrand v. Area Resources for Community and Human Services

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding three unwelcome sexual advances over nine months was not enough because “none ... was physically violent or overtly threatening” even when two instances involved overtly sexual touching
• finding severe, but infrequent conduct insufficient as a matter of law to support a claim for hostile work environment
• considering the same factors where the court declined to determine whether the harasser was a eo-worker or supervisor
• finding severe, but infrequent conduct insufficient as a matter of law to support a claim for hostile work environment
• grating summary judgment in favor of defendant where “[n]one of the incidents was physically violent or overtly threatening.”
• finding no actionable harassment when the harasser asked the plaintiff to view pornography with him, masturbate together, grabbed plaintiff’s bottom, and reached for other parts of plaintiff’s body

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).