Skip to main content
· 4/19/1982

Rodney W. Quinter v. Volkswagen of America, Volkswagen of Atlantic, Inc., Volkswagenwerk, A. G., Byron Bloch

Citations

  • 676 F.2d 969
  • 33 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 1619
  • 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 19981

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an expert witness and consultant was the enjoined party’s “agent” and for that reason “legally identified” with the enjoined party
  • noting that Volkswagen filed a motion for sanctions against Bloch after he deliberately divulged evidence placed under protective order
  • noting that Volkswagen filed a motion for sanctions against Bloch after he deliberately divulged evidence placed under protective order
  • noting the relief granted in civil contempt proceedings “usually takes the form of a fine in the amount of the damages sustained by petitioner and an award of costs and attorney’s fees”
  • affirming an order holding a party in contempt for violation of discovery procedures
  • same witness not held in contempt for holding the materials before the camera, but not reading their contents, on a nationally-televised news commentary show

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hunter, Higginbotham, Ackerman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.