· 4/19/1982
Rodney W. Quinter v. Volkswagen of America, Volkswagen of Atlantic, Inc., Volkswagenwerk, A. G., Byron Bloch
Citations
- 676 F.2d 969
- 33 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 1619
- 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 19981
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that an expert witness and consultant was the enjoined party’s “agent” and for that reason “legally identified” with the enjoined party
- noting that Volkswagen filed a motion for sanctions against Bloch after he deliberately divulged evidence placed under protective order
- noting that Volkswagen filed a motion for sanctions against Bloch after he deliberately divulged evidence placed under protective order
- noting the relief granted in civil contempt proceedings “usually takes the form of a fine in the amount of the damages sustained by petitioner and an award of costs and attorney’s fees”
- affirming an order holding a party in contempt for violation of discovery procedures
- same witness not held in contempt for holding the materials before the camera, but not reading their contents, on a nationally-televised news commentary show
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hunter, Higginbotham, Ackerman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.