Rodney Harrell v. United States Postal Service

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the court “usually tr[ies] to avoid” interpretations that render a CBA provision “superfluous”
• “the Supreme Court has established that nonmutual offensive collateral estoppel does not extend to litigation against the United States”
• “the Supreme Court has established that nonmutual offensive collateral estoppel does not extend to litigation against the United States”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).