Skip to main content
· 1/11/1990

Rodney D. Hendrick v. H.E. Avent, an Unincorporated Association

Citations

  • 891 F.2d 583
  • 15 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1111
  • 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 354
  • 1990 WL 21

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an order authorizing a sale of estate property is a final order
  • holding that an order authorizing a sale of estate property is a final order
  • “[M]aking appellant’s claim fit under the label of a Rule 60(b) motion would take . . . a relation back in time to the original complaint to fit within the time restraints. The district court properly refused to perform such feats.”
  • trustee’s actions under RICO and securities laws barred by bankruptcy court’s sale order authorizing transfer of title of stock against which trustee had launched his collateral action
  • “The law and policy surrounding a Rule 60(b) motion is clear that this motion was intended to be the only method of attacking a final judgment and not to be used in abundance.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garza, Williams, Davis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.