S.D. New York· 11/13/1978
Rodman v. Grant Foundation
Citations
- 460 F. Supp. 1028
- 1978 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14410
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- granting Rule 12(b)(6) motion where pertinent information “either was indeed disclosed or was easily enough available by duly diligent inquiry that it need not have been disclosed”
- proxy statements disclosed employee prices for stock and formula for price that defendant was to pay for shares; difference between those amounts easily calculable by plaintiffs
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Pollack
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Rodman v. Grant FoundationSecond Circuit· 1979-10-12· cited 88×
- Warner Communications, Inc. v. MurdochD. Delaware· 1984-03-16· cited 52×
- Polar International Brokerage Corp. v. ReeveS.D. New York· 2000-06-27· cited 41×
- Klamberg v. RothS.D. New York· 1979-06-22· cited 37×
- Lewis v. Oppenheimer & Co.S.D. New York· 1979-12-21· cited 19×
- Seidel v. Public Service Co. of New HampshireD. New Hampshire· 1985-08-27· cited 18×
- Fisher v. Plessey Co. Ltd.S.D. New York· 1983-03-15· cited 18×
- Mendell v. GreenbergS.D. New York· 1985-07-11· cited 16×
- Brickman v. Tyco Toys, Inc.S.D. New York· 1990-01-16· cited 13×
- Polar International Brokerage Corp. v. HyndmanS.D. New York· 2000-08-08· cited 11×
- Diamond v. ArendS.D. New York· 1986-11-17· cited 7×
- Gluck v. AgemianS.D. New York· 1980-07-16· cited 7×
- In Re W. T. Grant Co.S.D. New York· 1981-05-01· cited 6×
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,143Second Circuit· 1979-10-12
Cites
23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Santa Fe Industries, Inc. v. GreenSupreme Court· 1977-03-23· cited 1,218×
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,959 Frank Lanza, Jr. v. Drexel & Co., Theodore J. Kircher and Christie F. VitoloSecond Circuit· 1973-04-26· cited 381×
- Myzel v. FieldsEighth Circuit· 1967-10-12· cited 377×
- Joslyn v. JoslynSupreme Court· 1968-03-04· cited 270×
- Schoenbaum v. FirstbrookSecond Circuit· 1968-12-30· cited 229×
- Goldberg v. MeridorSecond Circuit· 1977-09-08· cited 162×
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,548 Radiation Dynamics, Inc. v. Lawrence GoldmuntzSecond Circuit· 1972-07-05· cited 152×
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,589 Jo v. Seibert v. Sperry Rand Corporation and James D. FinleySecond Circuit· 1978-10-31· cited 110×
- Golub v. PPD Corp.Eighth Circuit· 1978-05-11· cited 58×
- Stuart A. JACKSON, Appellant, v. Jack OPPENHEIM, AppelleeSecond Circuit· 1976-04-05· cited 51×
- Goldberger v. BakerS.D. New York· 1977-10-31· cited 43×
- Rochelle v. Marine Midland Grace Trust Co.Ninth Circuit· 1976-05-10· cited 43×
- Theodore Hafner v. Forest Laboratories, Inc., Hans Lowey and Bonded Laboratories, Inc.Second Circuit· 1965-05-05· cited 29×
- Joyce v. Joyce Beverages, Inc.Second Circuit· 1978-01-30· cited 29×
- Jewelcor Incorporated v. PearlmanS.D. New York· 1975-05-06· cited 26×
- Miller v. SchweickartS.D. New York· 1976-03-29· cited 23×
- Russell McPhail v. The L. S. Starrett CompanyFirst Circuit· 1958-07-18· cited 18×
- Tyco Laboratories, Inc. v. KimballE.D. Pennsylvania· 1977-10-12· cited 15×
- Jackson v. OppenheimS.D. New York· 1974-11-21· cited 14×
- Elgin National Industries, Inc. v. Chemetron CorporationD. Delaware· 1969-05-05· cited 14×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.