Rodlin v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding Sciarotta clearly distinguishable because “Step 2 ... concerns the use of a previous periodic rate to prorate the lump sum award, while Step 3 concerns the use of the maximum periodic rate in effect in the year of injury.”
• finding Sciarotta clearly distinguishable because “Step 2 . . . concerns the use of a previous periodic rate to prorate the lump sum award, while Step 3 concerns the use of the maximum periodic rate in effect in the year of injury.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).