Skip to main content
· 3/9/2009

Rodis v. City & County of San Francisco

Citations

  • 558 F.3d 964
  • 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 5444
  • 2009 WL 579510

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting “[t]he 12 Supreme Court has ‘recognized that it is inevitable that law enforcement officials will in some 13 cases reasonably but mistakenly conclude that probable cause is present.’ . . . In such cases those 14 official should not be held pe rsonally liable.”
  • “Probable cause to arrest 9 exists when officers have knowledge or reasonably trustworthy information 10 sufficient to lead a person of reasonable caution to believe that an offense has been 11 or is being committed by the person being arrested.”
  • probable cause to arrest exists if officers have “reasonably trustworthy information sufficient to lead a person of reasonable caution to believe that an offense has been or is being committed by the person being arrested” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nelson, Callahan, Carney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.