Rodges REDMOND, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. GAF CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a finding of accommodation is reviewed under the \clearly erroneous\ standard of review instead of under a de novo standard
• explaining that a religious belief is a belief that is considered religious \in [the] person's own scheme of things\ and is \sincerely held\
• explaining that Title VII protects “conduct which is ‘religiously motivated,’ i.e., all forms and aspects of religion, however eccentric”
• holding employee = s statement informing employer that A I [am] not able to work on Saturday because of my religious obligation @ was sufficient
• holding employee’s statement informing employer that “I [am] not able to work on Saturday because of my religious obligation” was sufficient
• explaining that Title VII protects “conduct which is ‘religiously motivated,’ i.e., all forms and aspects of religion, however eccentric”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).