Rodgers v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “A party cannot change his grounds for an objection or motion on appeal but is bound by the scope and nature of the arguments made at trial.”
• appellate courts review matters concerning the scope of cross-examination under an abuse-of-discretion standard

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Sweet v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2011-01-27· cited 49×
• Holloway v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2005-09-22· cited 16×
• Ellis v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2006-04-06· cited 15×
• McCoy v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2010-10-07· cited 15×
• Joyner v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2009-04-02· cited 14×
• Jackson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2018-04-04· cited 10×
• Moody v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2014-10-08· cited 9×
• Dawson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2016-11-16· cited 8×
• Gill v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2010-06-23· cited 8×
• Randle v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2008-01-31· cited 3×
• Jabari Smith v. State of Arkansas
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2024-10-31· cited 2×
• Patillo v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2015-12-03

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ferguson v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2000-12-14· cited 89×
• Otis v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2004-01-22· cited 45×
• Engram v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2000-05-04· cited 36×
• Woodruff v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1993-06-28· cited 28×
• Arnett v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2003-05-15· cited 26×