Skip to main content
Eleventh Circuit· 6/2/1998

Rodgers v. Singletary

Citations

  • 142 F.3d 1252
  • 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 11484
  • 1998 WL 281477

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that confinement in segregation for two months did not deprive inmate of a constitutionally protected liberty interest
  • holding that 2 months in administrative confinement did not violate the prisoner’s due process rights
  • concluding that two months in administrative confinement did not constitute a deprivation of a constitutionally protected liberty interest
  • concluding that two months in administrative confinement did not constitute a deprivation of a constitutionally protected liberty interest
  • concluding that spending two months in administrative confinement did not constitute a deprivation of a constitutionally protected liberty interest
  • holding that two months of administrative confinement did not implicate a protected liberty interest

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anderson, Cox, Dubina, Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.