Eleventh Circuit· 6/2/1998
Rodgers v. Singletary
Citations
- 142 F.3d 1252
- 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 11484
- 1998 WL 281477
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that confinement in segregation for two months did not deprive inmate of a constitutionally protected liberty interest
- holding that 2 months in administrative confinement did not violate the prisoner’s due process rights
- concluding that two months in administrative confinement did not constitute a deprivation of a constitutionally protected liberty interest
- concluding that two months in administrative confinement did not constitute a deprivation of a constitutionally protected liberty interest
- concluding that spending two months in administrative confinement did not constitute a deprivation of a constitutionally protected liberty interest
- holding that two months of administrative confinement did not implicate a protected liberty interest
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Anderson, Cox, Dubina, Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.