Rodgers v. Mikolajczak

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “This [garnishment proceeding] is not a new or different action, but a proceeding ancillary to the principal suit.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Burgess v. Holder
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1960-12-02· cited 11×
• American Mutual Liability Insurance v. Michigan Mutual Liability Co.
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1975-09-22· cited 7×
• American Mut. Liab. Ins. Co. v. Mich. Mut. Liab. Co.
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1975-09-22· cited 6×
• Thomas Luczak v. Corey a Drielick
  Michigan Supreme Court· 2021-04-09

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Francis v. Scheper
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1949-12-08· cited 55×
• Bennett v. Hill
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1955-06-29· cited 18×
• Banner Tobacco Co. v. Jenison
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1882-06-14· cited 15×
• Loomis v. Township Board of Rogers
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1884-03-06· cited 8×