Rodgers v. Hopper

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that DOC is entitled to sovereign immunity under § 14, because a judgment against it would be paid from the treasury of the State
• holding that DOC is entitled to sovereign immunity under § 14, because a judgment against it would be paid from the treasury of the State
• holding that DOC is entitled to sovereign immunity under § 14, because a judgment against it would be paid from the treasury of the State
• holding that DOC is entitled to sovereign immunity under § 14, because a judgment against it would be paid from the treasury of the State
• concluding that the DOC \is entitled to sovereign immunity\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).