Skip to main content
· 11/3/2005

Rodger Thornton v. Donald N. Snyder, Jr., Director, James M. Schomig, Warden, and Captain Josh J. Shettleworth

Citations

  • 428 F.3d 690
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 23723
  • 2005 WL 2877716

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a prisoner need not appeal a favorable resolution to his grievance to satisfy the PLRA's exhaustion requirements
  • holding that a prisoner was not required to “appeal grievances that were resolved as he requested and where money damages were not available.”
  • recognizing that “due process prohibits the denial of access to the courts”
  • finding that “district court did not abuse its discretion in conducting [prisoner’s civil rights] trial by video-conference”
  • noting that jury viewed a four-way screen with views of judge, plaintiff, witnesses, and defense counsel
  • considering the nature of the plaintiffs claim in upholding trial court’s decision to conduct trial by video conference

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cudahy, Posner, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.