Roderick Dev. Inv. Co. v. Community Bank of Edgewater

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing conversion claim where defendant refused plaintiff's demand to disburse funds to which plaintiff was entitled, concluding that refusal to return funds after demand was sufficient to establish wrongful dominion and control
• finding a valid conversion claim where the money that the Bank allegedly converted was a specific amount of funds that was transferred to the Bank by a third party and owned by plaintiff
• “[M]oney may be identified not only by segregation but also by its source or description.”
• “Although some courts in other states continue to require funds to be segregated in order to be the subject of a conversion action, we are persuaded by the reasoning of the courts in states that recognize that converted funds may be identifiable in other ways.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).