Skip to main content
· 7/2/2010

RODERER v. Dash

Citations

  • 233 P.3d 1101
  • 2010 Alas. LEXIS 70
  • 2010 WL 2637023

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding joint offer presented no apportionment problems when claims against separate defendants were overlapping
  • suggesting that using contingency fee amount as reasonable actual attorney's fees for a Rule 68 award was permissible although the method of calculating the post-offer portion of those fees was not
  • “Absent a specific objection at trial that complies with [Alaska Civil] Rule 51(a), we ‘will not review [a] jury instruction unless the giving of the challenged instruction was plain error.’ ” (second alteration in original

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carpeneti, Winfree, Christen, Fabe, Eastaugh

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.