Supreme Court· 6/9/1997
Rodea v. United States
Citations
- 520 U.S. 1269
- 138 L. Ed. 2d 203
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that an attorney's failure to challenge the type of methamphetamine did not amount to ineffective assistance of counsel
- “Under the abuse of discretion standard, an appellate court may not simply substitute its judgment for that of the lower court.”
- “Under the abuse of discretion standard, an appellate court may not simply substitute its judgment for that of the lower court ... ”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Ignacio Alberto ORTIZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Terry STEWART, Respondent-AppelleeNinth Circuit· 1998-07-01· cited 224×
- United States v. William L. Scholl, United States of America v. William L. SchollNinth Circuit· 1999-03-17· cited 169×
- Gallego v. McDanielNinth Circuit· 1997-09-04· cited 50×
- Reece v. United StatesEleventh Circuit· 1997-08-08· cited 30×
- United States v. NguyenC.D. California· 1998-03-12· cited 8×
- United States v. Jeremiah A. JacobsEighth Circuit· 1998-02-18· cited 6×
- Unnamed caseNinth Circuit· 1997-09-04· cited 3×
- United States v. Espinoza-GodinezD. Oregon· 1998-07-23· cited 3×
- United States v. ModafferiD. Hawaii· 2000-08-15· cited 2×
- United States v. Olmos-EsparzaS.D. California· 1997-08-12· cited 1×
- United States v. WebberD. Oregon· 1997-10-07
- United States v. MottD. Oregon· 1997-09-16
- United States v. Gurrola MadridD. Oregon· 1998-03-09
Other cases named Rodea v. United States
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.