Rode & Horn v. Phipps
Citations
- 195 F. 414
- 115 C.C.A. 316
- 1912 U.S. App. LEXIS 1386
Syllabus
<p>1. Bankruptcy (§ 461*)—Appeal—Time for Taking.</p> <p>The right of appeal under Bankr. Act July 1, 1898, c. 541, § 25a, 30 Stat. 553 (U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3432), once lost by a failure to appeal within the ten days allowed, cannot be revived by a petition for a rehearing.</p> <p>[Ed. Note.—For other cases, see Bankruptcy, Cent. Dig. §§ 920-923; Dec. Dig. § 461.*]</p> <p>2. Bankruptcy (§ 455*)—Appeal—Controversy Arising in Bankruptcy Proceeding.</p> <p>A hearing in a bankruptcy court on a petition by an adverse claimant who asserts delivery by the bankrupt to him, coupled with possession, of property included in the bankrupt’s schedules, as to part of which property claimant alleges ownership, and ás to all of which he claims right of possession, is a controversy arising in a bankruptcy proceeding; and the fact that the petition also sets up'the claim of the petitioner as a creditor, as dependent on the determination of his claim to the property, and raises' questions of priority between him and other creditors, does not. deprive him of the right to appeal from an adverse decision on his claim of ownership under Bankr. Act July I, 1898, c. 541, § 24a, 30 Stat. 553 (U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3431).</p> <p>[Ed. Note.—For other cases, see Bankruptcy, Cent. Dig. § 916; Dee. Dig. § 455.*]</p> <p>3. Bankruptcy (§ 449*)—Appellate Proceedings—Mode of Review.</p> <p>A final order of a court of bankruptcy on tbe intervening petition of an adverse claimant of property, not distinctly brought on either the law or equity side of the court, may be reviewed under Bankr. Act July 1, 1898, e. 541, § 24a, 30 Stat. 553 (U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3431), by appeal, even though the questions at issue are such as can be considered in a court of law. When review is desired only on one or more legal questions arising under such proceeding in intervention, writ of error is appropriate for the purpose. On appeal, the review may extend to questions of fact, while on writ of error only ques
Judges: Knappen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Thatcher v. United StatesSixth Circuit· 1914-04-17· cited 32×
- Live Stock State Bank v. DoyleEighth Circuit· 1923-08-22· cited 27×
- Southern Cotton Oil Co. v. ElliotteSixth Circuit· 1914-11-13· cited 18×
- National Discount Co. v. EvansSixth Circuit· 1921-03-18· cited 17×
- Martin v. Globe Bank & Trust Co. of PaducahSixth Circuit· 1912-11-07· cited 12×
- Chapman v. Federal Land Bank of Louisville, Ky.Sixth Circuit· 1941-01-14· cited 10×
- United States v. EastEighth Circuit· 1935-11-21· cited 9×
- American Nat. Bank v. HarrisTenth Circuit· 1936-06-05· cited 5×
- In Re E. H. Webb Grocery Co.M.D. Tennessee· 1940-02-01· cited 4×
- In re StaffordD. Connecticut· 1917-02-02· cited 2×
- Langos v. JacobsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee· 1928-01-07· cited 1×
- Federal Bond & Mortgage Co. v. Guardian Trust Co.Sixth Circuit· 1932-04-15· cited 1×
- Berry v. AustinSixth Circuit· 1938-04-12· cited 1×
- In re Hooven-Owens-Rentschler Co.Sixth Circuit· 1912-04-11· cited 1×
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- York Manufacturing Co. v. CassellSupreme Court· 1906-04-02· cited 320×
- Coder v. ArtsSupreme Court· 1909-04-05· cited 276×
- Thompson v. FairbanksSupreme Court· 1905-02-20· cited 259×
- Hewit v. Berlin MacHine WorksSupreme Court· 1904-05-16· cited 199×
- Conboy v. First Nat. Bank of Jersey CitySupreme Court· 1906-11-19· cited 98×
- Knapp v. Milwaukee Trust Co.Supreme Court· 1910-03-07· cited 62×
- In re MuellerSixth Circuit· 1905-02-07· cited 36×
- Moorman v. BeardSixth Circuit· 1907-06-15· cited 24×
- Beiser v. Western German BankSixth Circuit· 1909-02-22· cited 22×
- Insurance Co. v. ShoemakerTennessee Supreme Court· 1895-05-25· cited 19×
- Barnes v. PampelSixth Circuit· 1912-01-03· cited 19×
- Lookout Bank v. NoeTennessee Supreme Court· 1887-10-04· cited 16×
- In re HuxollSixth Circuit· 1912-02-13· cited 14×
- Charlotte A. Parish v. Harvey W. Ellis and WifeSupreme Court· 1842-03-18· cited 11×
- Bryant v. BankTennessee Supreme Court· 1901-10-14· cited 11×
- Douglas v. BankTennessee Supreme Court· 1896-06-30· cited 6×
- Lookout Bank v. SusongTennessee Supreme Court· 1891-10-15· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.