Roddy v. Harah

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• tennis courts constituted a permitted accessory use even though a majority, or even a substantial number, of residences within the community did not contain tennis courts
• tennis courts constituted a permitted accessory use even though a majority, or even a substantial number, of residences within the community did not contain tennis courts
• board could properly conclude that private tennis courts are customarily incidental to residential homes absent a determination that a majority or even a substantial number of residential properties in the neighborhood had tennis courts
• tennis courts permitted as cus tomarily incident to residential dwellings in that township
• tennis court properly held to be accessory use in residential district

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).