Rodd v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that where potential witnesses would have been character witnesses only, trial counsel = s failure to call them did not preclude appellant from advancing viable defense that he did not commit the offense and that he was physically unable to commit the offense
• court unable to conclude counsel ineffective when appellant failed to bring forth any evidence concerning counsel’s strategic reasons for failing to call twenty-two affiants who testified to appellant’s good character at the hearing on the motion for new trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).