Rodas-Orellana v. Holder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that M-E-V-G- and W-G-R- are \consistent with [the court's] past interpretation of social visibility\
• holding that proposed group of “El Salvadoran males threatened and actively recruited by gangs, who resist joining because they oppose the gangs” lacked social distinction
• holding that proposed group of “El Salvadoran males threatened and actively recruited by gangs, who resist joining because they oppose the gangs” lacked social distinction
• holding that proposed group of “El Salvadoran males threatened and actively recruited by gangs, who resist joining because they oppose the gangs,” lacked social distinction
• holding that proposed group of “El Salvadoran males threatened and actively recruited by gangs, who resist joining because they oppose the gangs” lacked social distinction
• holding that the group “El Salvadoran males threatened and actively recruited by gangs, who resist joining because they oppose the gangs” lacks social distinction from others threatened by gang violence (quotation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).