Skip to main content
· 2/1/2002

Rodarte v. Kansas Department of Transportation

Citations

  • 39 P.3d 675
  • 30 Kan. App. 2d 172
  • 2002 Kan. App. LEXIS 95

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an issue is moot where its resolution would have no practical effect on an existing controversy
  • case is moot where the controversy between the parties no longer exists and any judgment of the court would be ineffective
  • “ ‘ “The court is statutorily and constitutionally without authority to render advisory opinions in cases found to be moot. A case is moot when no further controversy exists between the parties and where any judgment of the court would be without effect.” ’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rulon, Johnson, Rogg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.