· 2/1/2002
Rodarte v. Kansas Department of Transportation
Citations
- 39 P.3d 675
- 30 Kan. App. 2d 172
- 2002 Kan. App. LEXIS 95
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that an issue is moot where its resolution would have no practical effect on an existing controversy
- case is moot where the controversy between the parties no longer exists and any judgment of the court would be ineffective
- “ ‘ “The court is statutorily and constitutionally without authority to render advisory opinions in cases found to be moot. A case is moot when no further controversy exists between the parties and where any judgment of the court would be without effect.” ’ ”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rulon, Johnson, Rogg
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.