Rod Wallace v. John Wynne Herron, John N. Gulick, Jr., Law Offices of John Wynne Herron, a Professional Corporation, and Daryl J. McKinstry

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the defendants did not undertake any “action that created the necessary connection with Indiana”
• holding that defendant law partners and partnership lacked requisite minimum contacts with Indiana where sole contact was a partner's trip to Indiana on one occasion to take depositions in a case unrelated to the controversy at issue
• holding that defendant law partners and partnership lacked requisite minimum contacts with Indiana where sole contact was a partner’s trip to Indiana on one occasion to take depositions in a case unrelated to the controversy at issue
• refusing to exercise personal jurisdiction because case did not arise from defendant's one contact with state
• refusing to exercise personal jurisdiction because case did not arise from defendant’s one contact with state
• finding no personal jurisdiction in a malicious prosecution case where Indiana resident was suing California defendants; alleged wrongful prosecution took place in California and defendants’ only contact with Indiana was sending legal documents related to the challenged suit

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).