Rocky Mountain Fuel Co. v. Whiteside

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[c]ourts often take a dim view of issues raised for the first time in post-judgment motions”
• exercising plenary review when the denial of a motion for reconsideration is predicated on an issue of law
• \The purpose of a motion for reconsideration ... is to correct manifest errors of law or fact....\ (first alteration in original
• ”[T]o the extent that the denial of reconsideration is predicated on an issue of law, such an issue is reviewed de novo.’’
• court reviews the denial of a motion for reconsideration for abuse of discretion
• aggregating the latter two reasons under a single rubric

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).