Skip to main content
· 9/5/1963

Rocky Mountain Fire & Casualty Co. v. Rose

Citations

  • 385 P.2d 45
  • 62 Wash. 2d 896
  • 1 A.L.R. 3d 876
  • 1963 Wash. LEXIS 406

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • where the intention of an insurance company was identical to that of the child's parents, issuance of a policy naming only the parent as a named insured constituted a mutual mistake since the written agreement did not express the identical intentions of the parties
  • where the intention of an insurance company was identical to that of the child’s parents, issuance of a policy naming only the parent as a named insured constituted a mutual mistake since the written agreement did not express the identical intentions of the parties

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ryan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.