· 9/5/1963
Rocky Mountain Fire & Casualty Co. v. Rose
Citations
- 385 P.2d 45
- 62 Wash. 2d 896
- 1 A.L.R. 3d 876
- 1963 Wash. LEXIS 406
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- where the intention of an insurance company was identical to that of the child's parents, issuance of a policy naming only the parent as a named insured constituted a mutual mistake since the written agreement did not express the identical intentions of the parties
- where the intention of an insurance company was identical to that of the child’s parents, issuance of a policy naming only the parent as a named insured constituted a mutual mistake since the written agreement did not express the identical intentions of the parties
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ryan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.