Rocky 116 L.L.C. v. Israelite

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting the argument that the limitations period should be tolled due to the provider's ongoing conduct and emphasizing that a plaintiff's knowledge of the injuries and the provider's alleged negligence triggered the accrual of the claim
• rejecting the argument that the limitations period should be tolled due to the provider's ongoing conduct and emphasizing that a plaintiff's knowledge of the injuries and the provider's alleged negligence triggered the accrual of the claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).