Skip to main content
· 7/20/1994

Rockwell International Corp. v. Superior Court

Citations

  • 26 Cal. App. 4th 1255
  • 32 Cal. Rptr. 2d 153
  • 94 Daily Journal DAR 10151
  • 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5561
  • 1994 Cal. App. LEXIS 751

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the doctrine applies \only when the client tenders an issue involving the substance or content of a protected communication\ (second emphasis added)
  • explaining that the doctrine applies \only when the client tenders an issue involving the substance or content of a protected communication\ (second emphasis added)
  • explaining that the doctrine applies \only when the client tenders an issue involving the substance or content of a protected communication\ (second emphasis added)
  • finding at issue doctrine not invoked because coverage action turns on underlying facts, not insured’s rebanee on advice of counsel as defense
  • because insurer did not rely on advice of counsel as defense but, rather, on underlying facts related to coverage question, privileged communications had not been placed at issue
  • “The extent of the attorney-client privilege is a matter of state law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Vogel (Miriam A.)

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.