· 7/20/1994
Rockwell International Corp. v. Superior Court
Citations
- 26 Cal. App. 4th 1255
- 32 Cal. Rptr. 2d 153
- 94 Daily Journal DAR 10151
- 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5561
- 1994 Cal. App. LEXIS 751
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that the doctrine applies \only when the client tenders an issue involving the substance or content of a protected communication\ (second emphasis added)
- explaining that the doctrine applies \only when the client tenders an issue involving the substance or content of a protected communication\ (second emphasis added)
- explaining that the doctrine applies \only when the client tenders an issue involving the substance or content of a protected communication\ (second emphasis added)
- finding at issue doctrine not invoked because coverage action turns on underlying facts, not insured’s rebanee on advice of counsel as defense
- because insurer did not rely on advice of counsel as defense but, rather, on underlying facts related to coverage question, privileged communications had not been placed at issue
- “The extent of the attorney-client privilege is a matter of state law.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Vogel (Miriam A.)
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.