Skip to main content
· 6/14/1972

Rockville Fuel and Feed Co. v. City of Gaithersburg

Citations

  • 291 A.2d 672
  • 266 Md. 117
  • 50 A.L.R. 3d 583
  • 1972 Md. LEXIS 722

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “a ‘vested right’ could only result when a lawful permit was obtained and the owner, in good faith, has proceeded with such construction under it____”
  • noting that, under the traditional vested rights test, which would have the effect of constitutionally protecting a property owner against subsequent changes in the zoning laws “prohibiting or limiting [a particular] use, the owner must (1
  • upholding a text amendment challenged on equal protection grounds even though it was enacted for the sole purpose of thwarting the construction of a specific concrete mixing plant
  • upholding a text amendment challenged on equal protection grounds even though it was enacted for the sole purpose of thwarting the construction of a specific concrete mixing plant
  • discussing an invalidated ordinance where “the sole basis for [different treatment] was a ‘plebescite [sic] of neighbors’ without any supporting evidence that related to the public health, comfort, safety or welfare []”
  • discussing an invalidated ordinance where “the sole basis for [different treatment] was a ‘plebescite [sic] of neighbors’ without any supporting evidence that related to the public health, comfort, safety or welfare []”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barnes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.