D. Maryland· 2/20/1985
Rockstroh v. AH Robins Co., Inc.
Citations
- 602 F. Supp. 1259
- 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22465
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “It appears to be universally held that, in order to maintain a valid action for loss of consortium, the parties must be married at the .time of the injury.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: James R. Miller, Jr.
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Pennwalt Corp. v. NasiosCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1988-12-21· cited 121×
- Shaw v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.D. Maryland· 1997-08-15· cited 66×
- In re Kirschner Medical Corp. Securities LitigationD. Maryland· 1991-07-26· cited 50×
- Lee v. Baxter Healthcare Corp.D. Maryland· 1989-06-23· cited 43×
- Martinez v. Showa Denko, K.K.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1998-07-13· cited 29×
- Martinez v. Showa Denko, KKNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1998-08-19· cited 26×
- Providence & Worcester Railroad v. Sargent & Greenleaf, Inc.D. Rhode Island· 1992-10-07· cited 23×
- In Re Lone Star Industries, Inc., Concrete Railroad Cross Ties LitigationD. Maryland· 1991-10-18· cited 16×
- Balog v. Center Art Gallery-Hawaii, Inc.D. Hawaii· 1990-08-21· cited 14×
- Barnhart v. Paisano Publications, LLCD. Maryland· 2006-10-17· cited 12×
- Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. GianottiCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2002-10-30· cited 10×
- Turner v. Smalis, Inc.D. Maryland· 1985-11-21· cited 7×
- Southland Corp. v. Marley Co.D. Maryland· 1993-03-01· cited 5×
- Stone-Pigott v. G.D. Searle & Co.D. Maryland· 1987-05-18· cited 5×
- Bishop of Charleston v. Century Indemnity Co.D. South Carolina· 2016-08-31· cited 4×
- Perlov v. GD SEARLE & COMPANYD. Maryland· 1985-11-18· cited 3×
- Crowley v. Fox Broadcasting Co.D. Maryland· 1994-05-03· cited 3×
- Barris v. United StatesW.D. Pennsylvania· 1994-02-21· cited 1×
Cites
28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court· 1970-06-01· cited 15,427×
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court· 1941-06-02· cited 8,668×
- Poffenberger v. RisserCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1981-07-09· cited 310×
- Alan B. Morrison v. Nissan Motor Co., Ltd., Nissan Motor Corporation in U. S. A., S. & R. Inc., D/B/A Vob Datsun SalesFourth Circuit· 1979-06-25· cited 269×
- James D. Cole v. Mary Franklin Carter Cole, Dale Padgett, J. H. PadgettFourth Circuit· 1980-10-09· cited 202×
- Hauch v. ConnorCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1983-01-04· cited 186×
- Harig v. Johns-Manville Products Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1978-11-21· cited 145×
- Overland Const. Co., Inc. v. SirmonsSupreme Court of Florida· 1979-03-01· cited 124×
- Waldman v. RohrbaughCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1966-01-07· cited 102×
- Leonhart v. AtkinsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1972-04-04· cited 81×
- Doughty v. PrettymanCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1959-02-16· cited 77×
- Bauld v. JA Jones Const. Co.Supreme Court of Florida· 1978-03-09· cited 68×
- Diamond v. ER Squibb and Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida· 1981-04-16· cited 57×
- President of Georgetown College v. MaddenD. Maryland· 1980-09-24· cited 50×
- Fertitta v. Bay Shore Development Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1969-03-07· cited 39×
- Universal Engineering Corp. v. PerezSupreme Court of Florida· 1984-05-17· cited 38×
- Lutheran Hospital v. LevyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1984-10-08· cited 38×
- Unnamed caseFourth Circuit· 1981-09-11· cited 32×
- Pottratz v. DavisD. Maryland· 1984-06-01· cited 31×
- Gillespie-Linton v. MilesCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1984-04-11· cited 26×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.