Skip to main content
· 10/4/2001

Rocknel Fastener, Inc. v. United States

Citations

  • 267 F.3d 1354
  • 23 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1513
  • 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 21502
  • 2001 WL 1168338

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that Explanatory Notes are “prepared by the World Customs organization to accompany the international harmonized schedule”
  • noting that Explanatory Notes are “prepared by the World Customs organization to accompany the international harmonized schedule”
  • explaining that Explanatory Notes are “prepared by the World Customs organization to accompany the international harmonized schedule”
  • explaining that the Explanatory Notes were “prepared by the World Customs Organization to accompany the international harmonized schedule”
  • stating that the court may consult “other reliable information sources” when determining common meaning
  • holding Skidmore deference is appropriate where Customs’ classification decision revealed Customs’ thorough analysis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schall, Bryson, Dyk

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.