· 10/4/2001
Rocknel Fastener, Inc. v. United States
Citations
- 267 F.3d 1354
- 23 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1513
- 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 21502
- 2001 WL 1168338
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that Explanatory Notes are “prepared by the World Customs organization to accompany the international harmonized schedule”
- noting that Explanatory Notes are “prepared by the World Customs organization to accompany the international harmonized schedule”
- explaining that Explanatory Notes are “prepared by the World Customs organization to accompany the international harmonized schedule”
- explaining that the Explanatory Notes were “prepared by the World Customs Organization to accompany the international harmonized schedule”
- stating that the court may consult “other reliable information sources” when determining common meaning
- holding Skidmore deference is appropriate where Customs’ classification decision revealed Customs’ thorough analysis
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Schall, Bryson, Dyk
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.