Rockman v. Philadelphia Stores Co.

Citations

• 78 Pa. Super. 397
• 1922 Pa. Super. LEXIS 126

Syllabus

<p>Contracts — Written contracts — Parol promises — Inducement to execution — Evidence—Case for jury.</p> <p>Where the plaintiff, seeking to recover salary, proved a written contract, which did not state the term of employment, and then introduced very definite testimony from one of the subscribing witnesses, supporting his own evidence that he was induced to enter into the written contract by a promise that the employment should last until the first of the next year, the court committed no error in submitting the case to the jury, since there was no reason to take it from them on the ground that the proof was not clear, precise and indubitable.</p>