Rockefeller v. Obama

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that ERISA did not apply to plan providing for deferred compensation even though former employees were not eligible if administrator determined they were terminated with cause or were competing with the company during the payout period
• holding that a deferred compensation arrangement did not constitute an ERISA plan because the amount of compensation was “based on a one-time calculation using a fixed formula, and writing a check each quarter is hardly an administrative scheme”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).