Rockcastle Mining, Lumber & Oil Co. v. Baker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting furnishers are in “the best position to determine” when a dispute is bona fide
• analyzing whether credit report is accurate or misleading from the perspective of a creditor
• assuming the CRA was notified based on plaintiffs alleging they “requested” the CRA to conduct an investigation since courts must treat all factual allegations as true in a complaint for purposes of a motion to dismiss
• acknowledging this incompatibility and declining to apply Chiang
• “To succeed in a suit arising under § 1681s–2(b), . . .a plaintiff must prove (1) that he notified a [credit reporting agency] of the dispute under § 1681i, (2) that the [credit reporting agency] notified the party who furnished the information[,] . . . and (3
• acknowledging this incompatibility and declining to apply Chiang

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).