· 8/4/1981
Rock v. Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination
Citations
- 424 N.E.2d 244
- 384 Mass. 198
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- upholding “continuing violation” regulation as permitting MCAD to remedy ongoing discriminatory policies
- upholding “continuing violation” regulation as permitting MCAD to remedy ongoing discriminatory policies
- “primary responsibility” to determine scope of G. L. c. 151B, § 5, “has been entrusted to the MCAD, not to the courts”
- “Since we find no error in the commission’s order . . . we do not reach these [procedural] issues”
- administrative interpretation accorded deference where agency must interpret a legislative policy which is only “‘broadly set out in the governing statute’”
- MCAD, not courts, has primary responsibility to determine scope of G. L. c. 151B
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hennessey, Braucher, Llacos, Abrams, Nolan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.