Skip to main content
· 8/4/1981

Rock v. Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination

Citations

  • 424 N.E.2d 244
  • 384 Mass. 198

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • upholding “continuing violation” regulation as permitting MCAD to remedy ongoing discriminatory policies
  • upholding “continuing violation” regulation as permitting MCAD to remedy ongoing discriminatory policies
  • “primary responsibility” to determine scope of G. L. c. 151B, § 5, “has been entrusted to the MCAD, not to the courts”
  • “Since we find no error in the commission’s order . . . we do not reach these [procedural] issues”
  • administrative interpretation accorded deference where agency must interpret a legislative policy which is only “‘broadly set out in the governing statute’”
  • MCAD, not courts, has primary responsibility to determine scope of G. L. c. 151B

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hennessey, Braucher, Llacos, Abrams, Nolan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.