Rock Plaster Manufacturing Co. v. Davis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that timely and adequate state court review of a Securities Exchange Act claim is not available because a common law fraud action is not equivalent to a federal securities action
• “Burford abstention has particular relevance to claims arising in 17 the course of state regulation of insolvent insurance companies.”
• federal court had exclusive jurisdiction over plaintiffs’ rule 10b-5 securities claims
• federal court had exclusive jurisdiction over plaintiffs' rule 10b-5 securities claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).