Rock Creek Alliance v. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that Fish and Wildlife did 11 not err by conducting a large-scale analysis and by relying on 12 the relative size of the critical habitat to evaluate the 13 project’s impact on the species
• upholding a no jeopardy determination for the bull trout even where FWS concluded “the rate of recovery of the core area population may slow slightly”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).