Rock Creek Alliance v. United States Forest Service

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing “most of the available habitat (85-90 percent) for both local populations will be unaffected” and “distribution of bull trout in these watersheds is likely to stay about the same”
• discussing propriety of supplemental reports but not discussing striking any such reports from the record
• arbitrary and capricious finding where agency relied on evidence it identified as “inadequate”
• “The permit is the means by which the Montana DEQ enforces state water quality standards, and the Forest Service is allowed to rely on the Montana DEQ to issue and enforce a valid permit.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).