Court of Appeals of Maryland· 7/11/2017
Rochkind v. Stevenson
Citations
- 164 A.3d 254
- 454 Md. 277
- 2017 WL 2952984
- 2017 Md. LEXIS 463
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that expert testimony was inadmissible under Rule 5-702(3) due to an “analytical gap”
- holding that expert testimony was inadmissible under Rule 5-702(3) due to an “analytical gap”
- considering case law from other jurisdictions when evaluating a novel issue
- epidemiological studies concluding that polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB’s
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Barbera, Greene, Adkins, McDonald, Watts, Hotten, Getty
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Sissoko v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2018-04-09· cited 680×
- Rochkind v. StevensonCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2020-08-28· cited 39×
- Savage v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2017-08-04· cited 22×
- State v. MatthewsCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2022-06-22· cited 13×
- Frankel v. DeaneCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2022-08-25· cited 10×
- Santiago v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2018-03-27· cited 7×
- Walter v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2018-11-02· cited 6×
- Oglesby v. Baltimore School AssociatesCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2023-07-26· cited 4×
- Lloyd v. NicetaCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2023-08-30· cited 4×
- Alford v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2018-03-02· cited 3×
- Rockman v. Union Carbide Corp.D. Maryland· 2017-07-17· cited 3×
- Sugarman v. LilesCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2017-11-01· cited 2×
- Burks v. AllenCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2018-08-30· cited 2×
- Sissoko v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2018-01-31
- Williams v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2021-07-07
- State v. MatthewsCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2022-06-21
- State v. MatthewsCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2022-11-21
- In the Matter of Antavis ChavisCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2023-12-21
- State v. Thornton & DunbarCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2026-06-26
Cites
24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 21,376×
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court· 1997-12-15· cited 4,535×
- Frye v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1923-12-03· cited 4,204×
- Reed v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1978-09-06· cited 224×
- Mitchell v. Gencorp Inc.Tenth Circuit· 1999-01-07· cited 216×
- In re Mirena IUD Products Liability LitigationS.D. New York· 2016-03-08· cited 90×
- Blackwell v. WyethCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2009-05-07· cited 69×
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. AlbrightCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2013-02-26· cited 69×
- Henricksen v. ConocoPhillips Co.E.D. Washington· 2009-02-11· cited 57×
- Sippio v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1998-08-05· cited 51×
- Guckenberger v. Boston UniversityD. Massachusetts· 1997-08-15· cited 40×
- State v. LoganCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2006-09-01· cited 40×
- Rollins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2006-05-05· cited 35×
- Bryant v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2006-06-05· cited 34×
- Roy v. DackmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2015-10-16· cited 34×
- Ross v. Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2013-03-22· cited 33×
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. FordCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2013-02-26· cited 33×
- Barksdale v. WilkowskyCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2011-05-23· cited 30×
- May v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2015-12-18· cited 26×
- Bentley v. CarrollCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1999-08-04· cited 20×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.