Skip to main content

Rochkind v. Stevenson

Citations

  • 164 A.3d 254
  • 454 Md. 277
  • 2017 WL 2952984
  • 2017 Md. LEXIS 463

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that expert testimony was inadmissible under Rule 5-702(3) due to an “analytical gap”
  • holding that expert testimony was inadmissible under Rule 5-702(3) due to an “analytical gap”
  • considering case law from other jurisdictions when evaluating a novel issue
  • epidemiological studies concluding that polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB’s

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barbera, Greene, Adkins, McDonald, Watts, Hotten, Getty

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.