Skip to main content
· 12/29/1903

Rochford v. School Dist. No. 11

Citations

  • 17 S.D. 542
  • 97 N.W. 747
  • 1903 S.D. LEXIS 90

Syllabus

<p>1. A school district order, duly issued, of which plaintiff in an action thereon was the owner, is prima facie evidence that a valid claim against the district has been lawfully presented and allowed.</p> <p>2. Where a complaint in an action on a school district order set out the order, and alleged that payment had been refused, the complaint was not demurrable on the ground that it failed to allege a demand.</p> <p>3. Where several defendants united in demurring to the complaint, and it stated a cause of action against one of them, the demurrer should he overruled as to all. Fuller, J., dissenting.</p>

Judges: Fuller, Haney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.