Rochelle v. White Castle Lumber & Shingle Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that, “at the motion[-]to[-]dismiss stage, the hurdle of alleging a causal link is not a high one”
• finding that other investigations involving defendant outside of case did not “impact the potential for reputational damage from this litigation”
• explaining that unrelated investigations do not necessarily mitigate reputational consequences of litigation itself
• finding that one plaintiff sufficiently pled facts to support retaliatory hostile work environment claim because plaintiffs had pled some conduct in support, and also finding that plaintiffs did not need to exhaustively list all actions evincing retaliatory intent in complaint
• dismissing negligent training and supervision claims because they were “not predicate[d] . . . on a common law cause of action”
• denying dismissal where plaintiff alleged she was “was not allowed to work [an] event . . . even though the event was understaffed” shortly after reporting her rape

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).