Skip to main content
· 4/3/1995

Roche v. Young Bros., Inc., of Florence

Citations

  • 456 S.E.2d 897
  • 318 S.C. 207
  • 1995 S.C. LEXIS 54

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that service was addressed to Edward L. Young, but J.N. Young picked up the process
  • noting that service was addressed to Edward L. Young, but J.N. Young picked up the process
  • stating that when service of process is accomplished by certified mail under Rule 4(d)(8), “the defendant, not the plaintiff, must prove the receipt was signed by an unauthorized person.”
  • explaining that Rule 4(d)(8) of the South Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure “requires that the return receipt be restricted to the addressee and show acceptance by the defendant”
  • explaining that Rule 4(d)(8) of the South Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure “requires that the return receipt be restricted to the addressee and show acceptance by the defendant”
  • explaining that Rule 4(d)(8) of the South Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure “requires that the return receipt be restricted to the addressee and show acceptance by the defendant”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Toal, Chandler, Finney, Moore, Wilson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.