Skip to main content
· 1/17/1975

Roche v. South Carolina Alcoholic Beverage Control Commission

Citations

  • 211 S.E.2d 243
  • 263 S.C. 451
  • 1975 S.C. LEXIS 405

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • considering local law enforcement officer’s testimony that past problems with public intoxication in the area would be increased by the additional location
  • “[S]ole issue on appeals of this nature is whether the Commission had sufficient evidence to support its decision.”
  • purpose of an appeal is to determine whether the trial judge erroneously acted or failed to act and when appellant’s contentions are not presented or passed on by the trial judge, such contentions will not be considered on appeal
  • the purpose of an appeal is to determine whether the trial judge erroneously acted or failed to act and where the appellant’s contentions are not presented or passed on by the trial judge, such contentions will not be considered on appeal.
  • the purpose of an appeal is to determine whether the trial judge erroneously acted or failed to act and where the appellant’s contentions are not presented or passed on by the trial judge, such contentions will not be considered on appeal
  • the purpose of an appeal is to determine whether the trial judge erroneously acted or failed to act and where the appellant’s contentions are not presented or passed on by the trial judge, such contentions will not be considered on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Littlejohn, Moss, Lewis, Bussey, Ness

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.