Roc Sansotta v. Town of Nags Head

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that due process requires “a fair process, . . . but does not require certain results” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• holding that the government defendant “waived the state-litigation 22 requirement by removing the case to federal court”
• explaining that ripeness in the context of a regulatory taking is “prudential rather than…jurisdictional”
• explaining “actions to abate a nuisance were reasonable . . . uses of [a government’s] police power” even if the exercise of authority was “mistaken”
• assuming that plaintiff’s allegations satisfied the similarly situated element
• noting that a to succeed on a liberty procedural due process claim, a plaintiff must allege: (1) he had a constitutionally cognizable liberty interest; (2) some type of state action deprived him of his liberty interest; and (3) his right was deprived absent sufficient process

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).