Robson v. Astrue

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a vocational expert’s testimony is substantial evidence when it is based on an accurately phrased hypothetical capturing the concrete consequences of a claimant’s limitations
• holding a VE’s testimony is substantial evidence when it is based on an accurately phrased hypothetical capturing the concrete consequences of a plaintiff’s limitations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).