Roboserve, Ltd., Cross-Appellant v. Tom's Foods, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Cross-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that prior panel decision regarding interpretation of Georgia law is binding until “an intervening Georgia case has specifically contradicted” it
• explaining that placing information in the public domain destroys any reasonable expectation of privacy and is not protected by Georgia law
• stating that circuit precedent controls over issues of state law unless an intervening state court case specifically contradicts it

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).