Robles v. Bureau of Prisons

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a foreign corporation with New York affiliates and offices located in New York was insufficient to establish that the corporation was “at home” in New York
• declining to address “scope of general jurisdiction under New York law” where exercising general jurisdiction “clearly inconsistent with Daimler”
• noting . that even if the domestic agents' contacts could be imputed to foreign corporate defendants, “the company's contacts with New York do not come close to making it 'at home’ there.”
• Daimler makes “clear that even a company’s ‘engage[ment] in a substantial, continuous, and systematic course of business’ is alone insufficient to render it at home in a forum” (quoting Daimler, 571 U.S. at ___, 134 S. Ct. at 761)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).